State Rep. Phil King, R-Weatherford, authored the amendment to the House rules to limit abuse of typographical mistakes to kill legislation. Points of order on those types of mistakes send bills back to committee to be corrected before they can return to the floor to be voted on.
"The practice has been to allow bill after bill after bill to be defeated because a clerk at midnight, a sleepy and tired 25-year-old, made a typographical error," King said. "That's just not appropriate."
Several Democrats and one Republican spoke against the provision, arguing that it weakens minority power. Rep. Armando Walle, D-Houston, said the amendment takes "tools out of the toolbox" for the minority party.
Since Republicans became the House majority in 2002, Democrats have often called points of order on the paperwork, including committee minutes and reports, that accompanies legislation. Under the new rule, a point of order may be overruled if it is "substantially fulfilled and the violation does not deceive or mislead."
Democrats argue that the wording is too ambiguous. "Your amendment doesn't seem to add more certainty, but less certainty," Rep. Harold Dutton, D-Houston, said.
Rep. Sylvester Turner, D-Houston went even further, claiming that the amendment renders the rulebook worthless. "'If you want to discard this book," he said, "we will vote for your amendment."
Rep. Gary Elkins, R-Houston, broke party lines by noting that point of orders only delay legislation by a few days. He also acknowledged that both Democrats and Republicans use point of orders to their own benefit.
The House rules are expected to be approved in full on Monday afternoon.
Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.